Lecture 11 Climate Policy Responses

Gang He

November 18, 2024

Sample analytic questions

  • What are the rationale under the evolution of climate discussion and negotiation?
  • What are the typic/classic policy instruments to address climate change?
  • What are the pros and cons of those instruments?
  • What further reserach is needed to show the cost-effectiveness of those instruments?

Update from COP29

A UN/global Carbon Market?

Climate negotiation: a brief history

  • 1997 Kyoto Protocol
    • Common but Differentiated Responsibilities
  • 2015 Paris Agreement
    • 2 \(^\circ\)C /1.5 \(^\circ\)C
    • NDC
  • 2025: COP30

Understanding the drivers

  • Carrot
  • Stick
  • Beyond “Carrot and Stick”

IPAT

\(I(mpact) = P(opulation) \times A(ffluence) \times T(echnology)\)

\(I(mpact) = \frac{P(opulation) \times A(ffluence)}{T(echnology)}\)

  • Technology: renewable energy, energy efficiency, innovations

Kaya identify

\(F=P \times \frac{G}{P} \times \frac{E}{G} \times \frac{F}{E}\)

Where:

  • F: global CO2 emissions from human sources
  • P: global population
  • G: world GDP
  • E: global energy consumption

And:

  • G/P: GDP per capita
  • E/G: energy intensity of the GDP
  • F/E: emission intensity of energy

Climate wedges

The Mckinsey cost curve

Social cost of carbon

  • Marginal cost of carbon
  • Cost included:
    • Net agricultural productivity
    • Human health
    • Property damage
    • Energy system costs
  • Cost not included:
    • Unknown impact: physical, ecological, economic
    • Unknown cost: information

EPA social cost of carbon

NYDEC ‘Value of Carbon’ Guidance

  • Carbon dioxide: $125 per ton
  • Methane: $2,782 per ton
  • Nitrous oxide: $44,727 per ton

SCC updates

Tax vs Cap and Trade

Similarities:

  • Achieve carbon emission reduction
  • Abatement costs
  • International competitiveness
  • Raising revenue
  • Social costs
  • Distributional impacts

Differences:

  • Transaction costs
  • Performance under uncertainty
  • Linkages
  • Price volatility
  • Interaction with complementary policies
  • Market manipulation
  • Administrative requirements

What works what’s not

  • Carbon tax vs. subsides
  • Regulations vs markets
  • Considering
    • Societal acceptance
    • Political feasibility

Best practices

  • Energy efficiency
  • Low carbon eco-city
  • Renewable integration
  • Sectoral experiences
  • Policy/technology tools

Policy instruments

Type of instruments

  • Regulations and Standards
  • Taxes and Charges
  • Tradable Permits
  • Voluntary Agreements
  • Subsidies and Incentives
  • Inforamtion Instruments
  • R&DD
  • Non-Climate Policies (Cobenefits)

What policies work

References

Armitage, Sarah C., Noël Bakhtian, and Adam B. Jaffe. 2023. “Innovation Market Failures and the Design of New Climate Policy Instruments.” Working Paper. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31622.
Ehrlich, Paul R., and John P. Holdren. 1971. “Impact of Population Growth: Complacency Concerning This Component of Man’s Predicament Is Unjustified and Counterproductive.” Science 171 (3977): 1212–17. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.
Gupta, D. A. Tirpak, S. 2007. “Policies, Instruments and Co-Operative Arrangements.” Book Section. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by P. R. Bosch B. Metz O. R. Davidson, 747–96. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4-wg3-chapter13-2.pdf.
Kaya, Yoichi, and Keiichi Yokobori, eds. 1997. Environment, Energy, and Economy: Strategies for Sustainable. Tokyo: United Nations Univ. https://archive.unu.edu/unupress/unupbooks/uu17ee/uu17ee00.htm.
Pacala, Stephen, and Robert Socolow. 2004. “Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies.” Science 305 (5686): 968–72. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100103.
Rennert, Kevin, Frank Errickson, Brian C Prest, Lisa Rennels, Richard G Newell, William Pizer, Cora Kingdon, et al. 2022. “Comprehensive Evidence Implies a Higher Social Cost of CO2.” Nature, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05224-9.
Stavins, Robert N. 2022. “The Relative Merits of Carbon Pricing Instruments: Taxes Versus Trading.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 16 (1): 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/717773.
Stechemesser, Annika, Nicolas Koch, Ebba Mark, Elina Dilger, Patrick Klösel, Laura Menicacci, Daniel Nachtigall, et al. 2024. “Climate Policies That Achieved Major Emission Reductions: Global Evidence from Two Decades.” Science 385 (6711): 884–92. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl6547.